Clinical Journals plays an important role in documenting the latest innovations in clinical research as research articles, reviews, commentaries, editorials and short communications. Developments in the clinical research lead to novel diagnostic procedures, drug design and development and innovative delivery mechanism. Clinical Journals provide global access to the researchers, authors and scholars in this field by widely publicizing their research innovations to the global audience. Circulation of the clinical research outcome through the peer reviewed open access clinical journals enables clinicians, practitioners, and physicians in applying this knowledge practically. This is radically transforming the practices in the healthcare industry, as it is leading to early diagnosis of the problem, efficient drug administration, prevention and cure of diseases that remained a great cause public health concern globally.
Clinical Journals Impact Factors List |
---|
Journal Name | Journal Impact Factor* | Citations Report |
---|
(crfa)- Journal ISSN : 2329-910X
- Journal h-index : 15
- Journal cite score : 3.44
- Average Acceptance to publication time (5-7 days)
- Average Article processing timeLess than 5 volumes 30 days
8 - 9 volumes 40 days 10 and more volumes 45 days
| 2.34 3.49 (5 Yr Journal Impact Factor) | Citations Report |
Neonatal and Pediatric Medicine (NNP)- Journal ISSN : 2572-4983
- Journal h-index : 8
- Journal cite score : 1.12
- Average Acceptance to publication time (5-7 days)
- Average Article processing timeLess than 5 volumes 30 days
8 - 9 volumes 40 days 10 and more volumes 45 days
| 0.91 1.12 (5 Yr Journal Impact Factor) | Citations Report |
Pediatric Dental Care (pdc)- Journal ISSN : 2573-444X
- Average Acceptance to publication time (5-7 days)
- Average Article processing timeLess than 5 volumes 30 days
8 - 9 volumes 40 days 10 and more volumes 45 days
| - | Citations Report |
JBR Journal of Interdisciplinary Medicine and Dental Science (jimds)- Journal ISSN : 2376-032X
- Average Acceptance to publication time (5-7 days)
- Average Article processing timeLess than 5 volumes 30 days
8 - 9 volumes 40 days 10 and more volumes 45 days
| - | Citations Report |
Atherosclerosis: Open Access (asoa)- Journal h-index : 3
- Journal cite score : 0.21
- Average Acceptance to publication time (5-7 days)
- Average Article processing timeLess than 5 volumes 30 days
8 - 9 volumes 40 days 10 and more volumes 45 days
| 0.15 0.20 (5 Yr Journal Impact Factor) | Citations Report |
(jspt)- Journal ISSN : 2472-5005
- Journal h-index : 9
- Journal cite score : 1.76
- Average Acceptance to publication time (5-7 days)
- Average Article processing timeLess than 5 volumes 30 days
8 - 9 volumes 40 days 10 and more volumes 45 days
| 1.41 1.75 (5 Yr Journal Impact Factor) | Citations Report |
Optometry: Open Access (omoa)- Journal ISSN : 2476-2075
- Journal h-index : 6
- Journal cite score : 0.69
- Average Acceptance to publication time (5-7 days)
- Average Article processing timeLess than 5 volumes 30 days
8 - 9 volumes 40 days 10 and more volumes 45 days
| 0.5 0.73(5 Yr Journal Impact Factor) | Citations Report |
Toxicology: Open Access (tyoa)- Journal ISSN : 2476-2067
- Journal h-index : 8
- Journal cite score : 2.25
- Average Acceptance to publication time (5-7 days)
- Average Article processing timeLess than 5 volumes 30 days
8 - 9 volumes 40 days 10 and more volumes 45 days
| 1.55 2.66 (5 Yr Journal Impact Factor) | Citations Report |
Cancer Surgery (CNS)- Journal ISSN : 2573-542X
- Journal h-index : 2
- Journal cite score : 0.05
- Average Acceptance to publication time (5-7 days)
- Average Article processing timeLess than 5 volumes 30 days
8 - 9 volumes 40 days 10 and more volumes 45 days
| 0.05 0.07 (5 Yr Journal Impact Factor) | - |
Journal of Dental Science and Medicine (DID)- Journal h-index : 2
- Journal cite score : 0.27
- Average Acceptance to publication time (5-7 days)
- Average Article processing timeLess than 5 volumes 30 days
8 - 9 volumes 40 days 10 and more volumes 45 days
| 0.08 0.36 (5 Yr Journal Impact Factor) | Citations Report |
Cardiovascular Therapy: Open Access (CTOA)- Average Acceptance to publication time (5-7 days)
- Average Article processing timeLess than 5 volumes 30 days
8 - 9 volumes 40 days 10 and more volumes 45 days
| - | Citations Report |
Transplant Reports : Open Access (TROA)- Journal h-index : 4
- Journal cite score : 0.45
- Average Acceptance to publication time (5-7 days)
- Average Article processing timeLess than 5 volumes 30 days
8 - 9 volumes 40 days 10 and more volumes 45 days
| 0.54 0.40 (5 Yr Journal Impact Factor) | - |
JBR Journal of Clinical Diagnosis and Research (JCDR)- Journal ISSN : 2376-0311
- Average Acceptance to publication time (5-7 days)
- Average Article processing timeLess than 5 volumes 30 days
8 - 9 volumes 40 days 10 and more volumes 45 days
| - | Citations Report |
Journal of Clinical and Experimental Transplantation (JCET)- Journal ISSN : 2475-7640
- Journal h-index : 3
- Journal cite score : 0.12
- Average Acceptance to publication time (5-7 days)
- Average Article processing timeLess than 5 volumes 30 days
8 - 9 volumes 40 days 10 and more volumes 45 days
| 0.06 0.14 (5 Yr Journal Impact Factor) | - |
(jcep)- Journal ISSN : 2161-0681
- Journal h-index : 17
- Journal cite score : 3.61
- Average Acceptance to publication time (5-7 days)
- Average Article processing timeLess than 5 volumes 30 days
8 - 9 volumes 40 days 10 and more volumes 45 days
| 3 3.95 (5 Yr Journal Impact Factor) | Citations Report |
FAQs
In general, an impact factor of 10 or higher is considered remarkable, while 3 is good, and the average score is less than 1. 🍍 Who invented the impact factor? Eugene Garfield, the founder of the Institute for Scientific Information (ISI), invented the measurement known as impact factor.
Is 1 a good CiteScore? ›
Comparing the CiteScore to the Impact factor (CS/IF) for the selected journals (column 3 of Table 2), the CiteScore is 1.69 ± 0.61 (mean and standard deviation) times that of the Impact Factor. A number greater than 1 indicates a higher CiteScore, and a number less than one indicates a higher Impact Factor.
What medical journal has the highest impact factor? ›
Rank | Journal | Impact Factor |
---|
1 | CA-A Cancer Journal for Clinicians | ca. 254.7 |
2 | Lancet | ca. 168.9 |
3 | New England Journal of Medicine | ca. 158.5 |
4 | JAMA-Journal of the American Medical Association | ca. 120.7 |
46 more rows
Is a higher or lower impact factor better? ›
Impact Factors are used to measure the importance of a journal by calculating the number of times selected articles are cited within the last few years. The higher the impact factor, the more highly ranked the journal. It is one tool you can use to compare journals in a subject category.
Is an impact factor of 5.7 good? ›
In most fields, the impact factor of 10 or greater is considered an excellent score while 3 is flagged as good and the average score is less than 1.
What does an impact factor of 2.5 mean? ›
e.g. an impact factor of 2.5 means that on average an article has been cited 2.5 times.
Which is more important, CiteScore or impact factor? ›
The higher the CiteScore, the more valuable the journal is deemed to be. The impact factor of a journal is calculated by dividing the number of current year citations to the source items published in that journal during the previous two years.
How do I convert CiteScore to impact factor? ›
The Impact Factor is calculated as all incoming citations divided by the number of regular research articles: IF=(CF+CR)/NR. The CiteScore, by contrast, includes all articles, whether front matter or research articles, in the denominator: CS=(CF+CR)/(NF+NR).
What is the CiteScore * best quartile? ›
CiteScore* Best Quartile
This metric indicates a journal's ranking in its best performing category. How is it calculated? The highest ranking the journal has in a Scopus subject category. Quartile 1 (Q1) = the 25% of journals with the highest CiteScores in that category.
What are the top 5 medical journals? ›
Health & Medical Sciences (general)
| Publication | h5-index |
---|
1. | The New England Journal of Medicine | 439 |
2. | The Lancet | 368 |
3. | JAMA | 286 |
4. | Nature Medicine | 268 |
16 more rows
The New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) is recognized as the world's leading medical journal and website.
Is PNAS a high impact journal? ›
With a competitive impact factor of 9.6 and a 19% acceptance rate for papers submitted directly, PNAS remains one of the most prestigious and highly cited multidisciplinary research journals.
What is a respectable impact factor? ›
In most fields, the impact factor of 10 or greater is considered an excellent score while 3 is flagged as good and the average score is less than 1.
Which is more important h-index or impact factor? ›
Your colleagues are right though. As a researcher, it is more useful for you to calculate your h index than to use the journal impact factor as a measure of prestige. The h index can especially work to your advantage if you have published many papers.
Is it easier to publish in a low impact factor journal? ›
The basic answer is yes, but there a few caveats. First, there is a difference between a low impact factor conference and a bad conference. Bad conference (e.g. predatory ones, which will publish anything after a bogus peer review and charge a lot of money) should be avoided.
Is impact factor 5 good or bad? ›
A good impact factor can vary by field, but in many scientific disciplines, an IF above 5 or 10 is often considered high.
What is the 5 year impact factor? ›
The ISI 5-Year Impact Factor is the average number of times articles from the journal published in the past five years have been cited in the given Journal Citation Report (JCR) year.
Is Q2 journal good? ›
Q1 comprises the most (statistically) prestigious journals within the subject category; i.e., the top 25% of the journals on the list. Q2 journals fall in the 25%–50% group, Q3 journals in the 50%–75% group, and finally, Q4 in the 75%–100% group.
What is a good journal h-index? ›
Now let's talk numbers: what h-index is considered good? According to Hirsch, a person with 20 years of research experience with an h-index of 20 is considered good, 40 is great, and 60 is remarkable.